Marriage

Nov. 12th, 2008 12:21 pm
mamadeb: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
[personal profile] mamadeb
Marriage in the USA is a civil matter, not a religious one. For reasons of tradition, we empower religious officicants to enact marriages, but those marriages do not exist legally unless a marriage license is also issued. (Any one with multiple spouses knows this. For that matter, I know of Orthodox Jewish couples who chose not to have marriage licences. They are married halachically, but the state doesn't recognize it.) We also empower secular officials (judges, justices, county clerks) to do the same. There is no set ceremony (the Jewish ceremony does not resemble any Christian ceremony, for example - no vows are made, no kisses are exchanged.)

Because of this, and because no state can possibly require a religion to perform a marriage against its own tenets, I really don't see how any church or set of beliefs should have any bearing on who should or should not get married other than under their own auspices. I've said this before - Judaism, for example, forbids a marriage between a man and his ex-wife's sister (or his wife's sister, for that matter) in his ex-wife's lifetime. (Jacob married his wives before the Torah was given.) No Orthodox rabbi would perform this marriage. However, such a couple is and should be perfectly permitted to marry civilly. No synagogue has lost any tax-exempt status or been fined because of this.

If LDS or Orthodox Judaism or Catholicism or whoever do not want to perform gay marriages, this is their right and their privilege, and it would be wrong to require them to do so. But that has nothing to do with equality before the law. The right and penalities of marriage should be available to all consenting parties - anything else denies the equality of all adult Americans.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-12 10:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amireal.livejournal.com
Well I shouldn't be so sarcastic, after all I participated in a civil ceremony (witness) that took place in a court house, was presided over by a judge-- and mentioned Jesus no less than twice. I could FEEL the bride and groom twitch because they had wanted a civil ceremony and neither of them were any form of Catholic/Christian, etc.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-11-12 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ataniell93.livejournal.com
There really does seem to be a lot of fail involved in the comprehension of the term "civil ceremony." At least my third marriage (and worst lol) was Jesus-free.

I actually erred above. Blame it on cold meds. My second husband's FAMILY was Catholic. He was pagan. And...you know me :)

Profile

mamadeb: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
mamadeb

February 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
2728     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags