Gendercrossing Cliche
Feb. 4th, 2008 06:29 pmYou know the one - the one where Terry, who prefers the opposite sex, meets Chris, who is of the same sex, and falls in love and therefore Terry is confused about sexual preference - to the point of deciding that the actual preference is for the same sex, only to find out that Chris is, indeed, of the opposite sex and therefore all is well. Clearly Terry sensed that Chris was the appropriate gender from the begining. It's a plot as old as, and very probably older than, Shakespeare.
And I just finished reading a novel where that was a background plot, and as I read it, I began to feel bad - if the real young man decided he was in love with another one, it means he's either always known he was gay or bi, or loves the false young man enough to transcend that (yeah, basis of slash stories.) And so, when he discovers the truth, he's more likely to feel anger than pleasure or relief, and since the person in the boy's clothes is a different person - one who lied to him - he might need time to sort out his feelings.
I sort of covered this in the Sweetcheeks series, where Blair falls in love with the very straight-acting Jim Ellison, only to find that he's been hiding his true queenlike self. I wrote it for laughs at first, but by the end, I knew it was a real problem that would have to be addressed.
As it happens in the novel, the real young man figured out that it was a young woman *first*, and then fell in love, which was perfect. He also understood that the reason she lied was to get the sort of job she loved but couldn't get in that medieval fantasy setting as a woman. In fact, when they married, it was to form a partnership using her considerable skills in that area. All good, you see.
I also watched Victor/Victoria yesterday. And - aside from the fact that no one could look a Julie Andrews and not see and hear "woman", even with short hair, men's clothes and a deepened voice - it was the same plot. And James Garner, who had led himself to accept the fact that he was attracted to a (extremely feminine) man, to the point that he was spying on 'Victor" in his bath, was entirely relieved, despite the fact that he'd possibly been assuming fantasizing about an very different set of parts.
Of course, "Yay! I'm not gay!" is probably a reasonable reaction for that particular character in that place and time. Or even later, thinking about Chris in the Morning on Northern Exposure and his crush on the monk who turned out to be female.
And I just finished reading a novel where that was a background plot, and as I read it, I began to feel bad - if the real young man decided he was in love with another one, it means he's either always known he was gay or bi, or loves the false young man enough to transcend that (yeah, basis of slash stories.) And so, when he discovers the truth, he's more likely to feel anger than pleasure or relief, and since the person in the boy's clothes is a different person - one who lied to him - he might need time to sort out his feelings.
I sort of covered this in the Sweetcheeks series, where Blair falls in love with the very straight-acting Jim Ellison, only to find that he's been hiding his true queenlike self. I wrote it for laughs at first, but by the end, I knew it was a real problem that would have to be addressed.
As it happens in the novel, the real young man figured out that it was a young woman *first*, and then fell in love, which was perfect. He also understood that the reason she lied was to get the sort of job she loved but couldn't get in that medieval fantasy setting as a woman. In fact, when they married, it was to form a partnership using her considerable skills in that area. All good, you see.
I also watched Victor/Victoria yesterday. And - aside from the fact that no one could look a Julie Andrews and not see and hear "woman", even with short hair, men's clothes and a deepened voice - it was the same plot. And James Garner, who had led himself to accept the fact that he was attracted to a (extremely feminine) man, to the point that he was spying on 'Victor" in his bath, was entirely relieved, despite the fact that he'd possibly been assuming fantasizing about an very different set of parts.
Of course, "Yay! I'm not gay!" is probably a reasonable reaction for that particular character in that place and time. Or even later, thinking about Chris in the Morning on Northern Exposure and his crush on the monk who turned out to be female.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-05 12:42 am (UTC)(b) I was just watching clips from Victor/Victoria on YouTube this morning, starting with "Le Jazz Hot". I don't know -- I think that some of the costuming was chosen specifically to make her look more like a man-pretending-to-be-a-woman -- the choker, for example, and the way some of the costumes make her look more broad-shouldered-triangular than her natural (hourglassy) shape. The situation there -- see, the spying-in-the-bath thing, I did not read as spying on someone to get hot & bothered. I think he was spying on her because he suspected that Count Victor might not actually be male, and was trying to confirm it. (And I think he was probably freakin' out & mentally glossing over the possible boy bits in his fantasizing, too.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-05 03:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 06:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 06:46 pm (UTC)The costuming might have helped, but Julie Andrew's face and voice are just so feminine...I don't know. I know they were making her into a languid, slender boy. It had to be part of the joke, of course.
I'm not sure what would have happened if Victor hadn't been really Victoria.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 07:05 pm (UTC)Then it's the book I was thinking of, yes. What do you think of it so far?
In my head, they have a torrid affair and then split up when King can't handle the pressure.
What I find most unbelievable about that movie is that a singer as talented and lovely as Julie Andrews would be struggling to find work.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 07:18 pm (UTC)And, yes. That didn't make sense, either.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 07:42 pm (UTC)The comment about King was about if Victor had really been Victor, not about the book.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 07:57 pm (UTC)Okay. I'd hope they'd have an affair, too, but I'm biased.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-05 03:12 am (UTC)Romilly's disguised as a boy, and she has a crush on this man, and he seems to like her back. He makes a pass. Yay, he must have guessed her secret! She divulges her secret. He is nice, but his ardour is instantly chilled. He thought she was a boy.
On a more fanfic note, I read a transfic recently where William Beckett is MTF, and is slowly taking steps about transitioning, and has told her band. Her friend Mike is supportive, but then confesses that he's always been attracted to William, and he must have somehow known. William is furious - for a start she's only interested in women, but more to the point, she tells Mike "Don't involve me in your homophobic freak-out. You thought I was a guy, and you were attracted to me. Deal with it."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 06:56 pm (UTC)I assume you're talking about bandom, of which I'm profoundly ignorant.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-05 05:52 am (UTC)Searching at mudcat.org on the keyword "transvestite" brings up almost fifty folksongs. Most, if not all, seem to be about women disguised as men.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 06:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 06:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 06:55 pm (UTC)And king still offers to marry her as the solution to his problems. But she likes dressing as a man and refuses.
(It does remind me a bit of Aral and Cordelia from Lois McMaster Bujold's Vorkosiverse. Aral is bisexual, but skewed towards soldiers, and his planet doesn't have women in the military. Cordelia, who is a ship's captain, solves that nicely. Although he still has very, very pretty young officers as his secretaries. Aral likes the eye candy, even if he won't touch.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-06 07:11 pm (UTC)He's such a galactic -- even so Betan in some other ways -- that it really stands out. To Bel, too, obviously....
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 05:51 am (UTC)Yes, I remember Chris was definitely "Yay, I'm not gay!" but he couched it in terms of it just being a big change to his identity because he had always been very straight. It seems like this is different for men than women. On The L Word one of the characters says "most women are straight until they're not."
I wonder what is appealing about this story. On one hand it's like the fairy tale--because you can love the person no matter what's on the outside, you'll get what's on the inside too. Almost like stories where the person falls in love with a crone or an animal who turns into a beautiful girl/boy after sex. (I assume you understand I'm not saying that gay=ugly or gay=animal, just that it's playing on the "inappropriate sex object" idea)
At the same time it also kind of gets into the question of where attraction lies. Would the James Garner character have really been attracted to Julie Andrews if she'd really been a man? I tend to think no. Because I think it's possible for somebody to be passing as a different gender while maybe sending out things the body unconsciously responds to as the real gender. (A transsexual, I would speculate, would send out "signals" of their true gender--not the one their body showed when they were born.)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 06:41 am (UTC)Our plucky heroine wants nothing more than to be a knight. Between the training for that and the hiding, she sort of grows up gender-neutral. Of course, she meets a man and falls in love, but can't see herself with him because she is, above all things, a (wanna-be) knight and knights don't fraternize. It doesn't quite occur to her that he's straight and thinks she's male. The hero also falls in love, despite his best efforts to ignore his own feelings. Mostly he's concerned about the fact that he's suddenly jonesing for a boy.
And then he decides that he can't deny his feelings and he's going to go for it! This self-acceptance (albeit reluctant) was quite progressive, I thought. Of course, during the going for it, he discovers that she has womanly attributes and is terribly relieved. Still, we're left with a heroine who's got gender issues and a hero who's sort of a bisexual. I still don't know how that made it into a Harlequin. I always wished I had kept track of the name or the author.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 02:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 06:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 08:27 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_und_Viktoria
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 09:04 am (UTC)...And then it turns out that the crossdresser is actually their half-sister, so I guess it's all for the best. :-)
I didn't have a problem with Victor/Victoria - apart from the fact that I found King absolutely repulsive and didn't want him dating Victoria, ever. When someone so vehemently insists that the object of his attraction is a woman, I find the immediate post-reveal "Yay! Let's date!" a bit more believable than, say, Twelfth Night. (Though I love Twelfth Night.)
The Casanova miniseries was a bit like V/V: Giacomo fancies Bellino and refuses to accept the idea that s/he's really a man. He's devastated when he comes to believe that's the truth, and his sometimes girlfriend calls him on it: "Do you love him?" "Yes." "Then love him. Coward." So when he finally accepts his attraction, it's more on a dare than anything else - and so he's relieved to find out he was right all along.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 01:00 pm (UTC)Growing up, all those stories: Syliva Scarlett, As You Like It, Viktor und Viktoria and its remakes First A Girl and Victor/Victoria - for me they were all secret messages within ordinary heterosexual romances. So I loved them because they hinted the possibility of another ending. I would like to think that there's more to them than simply the comforting security of the restoration of order.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 01:57 pm (UTC)In the movie "Different for Girls," Rupert Graves' character realizes he was always sort of attracted to his friend Karl (played by Steven Mackintosh), who has transitioned and becomes his girlfriend Kim.
Plays written before female actors were allowed are a special case--in a sense, the whole hoo-haw is used not just for ambiguous sexual thrills but so that fewer spectators would sit in the alehouse afterwards saying, "Sure, that was a pretty dress, but you could see from a mile away that that was a boy."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-10 03:44 am (UTC)I remember that book!
(From
(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-11 02:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-11 02:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-02-09 03:57 pm (UTC)Jake (Jaqueline) starts new at a all-boys boarding school and quickly attracts the interest of the Deans son, Hamilton. Jake is interested back and acts on it, only to have Hamilton react quite badly. It goes on like that for a while, buildin tension, until Hamilton finally is prompted (by a girl who Jake-as-a-boy sort of dated, eh long story!) to admitt to himself that he's got a crush on Jake and confronts Jake about it in the bathroom ("we're gay!"), only to find out that ta-da, Jake is a girl! To which he doesn't emediately react with relief but rather anger and surprise. They do end up together, but Jake also tells Hamilton "Hey, you know, you totally dig boys. That's why you like me."
Of course, I tend to read Jake as a trans-boy, but I don't think that is the point of the show. For being a show sponsored by Coca Cola, this storyline is quite queer. And lovely. I adore Jake and Hamilton and their whole story, and I've always enjoyed that throughout the show, Hamilton is a bit conflicted about Jake being both his best guy friend and his girlfriend.
Was that even coherent? heh. I tried!