I just joined
fandom_counts
May. 30th, 2007 01:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And even while I was doing it, I was thinking how useless it could be.
Why? Because the vast majority of LJ users are still high school and college students using LJ as a social interaction network - same as fandom, but in much, much greater numbers. If we disappeared, LJ would notice. For a day or so. Because maybe the site would run a tad faster with all the communities gone. Maybe. But, see, I could be wrong, so I joined it.
Okay, I'm doing the math here. 13 million livejournals. I could be wrong, but a *generous* estimate for the fen here - 10K. That's 0.8% - and even if as much as half the ljs are actually not active or just puppets or comms (and LJ just did a purge, so who knows?) - that's 1.6% of the total.
We'll basically be showing LJ that we are essentially meaningless. Go US!
And I'm not convinced that putting notices in your userinfo will stop them from suspending your lj - assuming they even read the userinfo beyond the interests.
Question - have any survivors of child sexual abuse communities been deleted? I've heard rumors, but none of the posts that list suspended communities mention those. Because if they haven't, then it's not just interests, or maybe it's a combination of interests.
And, yeah, I did clean up my interests a little bit - I got rid of "slash", "yaoi" and "pretty boys." I also added "freedom of speech." And I archived my fiction journal.
Why? Because the vast majority of LJ users are still high school and college students using LJ as a social interaction network - same as fandom, but in much, much greater numbers. If we disappeared, LJ would notice. For a day or so. Because maybe the site would run a tad faster with all the communities gone. Maybe. But, see, I could be wrong, so I joined it.
Okay, I'm doing the math here. 13 million livejournals. I could be wrong, but a *generous* estimate for the fen here - 10K. That's 0.8% - and even if as much as half the ljs are actually not active or just puppets or comms (and LJ just did a purge, so who knows?) - that's 1.6% of the total.
We'll basically be showing LJ that we are essentially meaningless. Go US!
And I'm not convinced that putting notices in your userinfo will stop them from suspending your lj - assuming they even read the userinfo beyond the interests.
Question - have any survivors of child sexual abuse communities been deleted? I've heard rumors, but none of the posts that list suspended communities mention those. Because if they haven't, then it's not just interests, or maybe it's a combination of interests.
And, yeah, I did clean up my interests a little bit - I got rid of "slash", "yaoi" and "pretty boys." I also added "freedom of speech." And I archived my fiction journal.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-30 05:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-30 05:43 pm (UTC)Otherwise, I'm completely at a loss.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-30 06:10 pm (UTC)They don't seem to be interested in plain old gay porn.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-30 06:06 pm (UTC)Putting a disclaimer in your journal profile WILL NOT prevent deletion or enable you to get a deleted account back. One of the deleted RPG character journals I lost had a MASSIVE disclaimer which I put there because creepy people were finding the journal and trying to friend it. In other words, I took steps to prevent the use of the interest search as a mechanims for creeps to find each other--I disclaimered the heck out of that journal. The other journal had less of a strong disclaimer because creepy people hadn't been trying to friend it, but it did have one. The disclaimers matter not a whit to LJ Abuse. Nor did my promise to remove all suspicious interests if they just let me have the journals back. They said that would make them liable if I did commit a crime (even though they knew I wouldn't, or at least said so.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 01:13 am (UTC)I think a sizable portion of LJ is fandom, especially the most active journals, but we'll see I guess. Of course there are huge heaps of inactive journals...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 01:23 am (UTC)A lot of people have more than one fannish journals, just as I do, and they're being encouraged to have those puppet journals also join
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 01:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 01:40 am (UTC)I'll even postulate that a sizable percentage of those 13M journals are not being used.
But aren't we also telling LJ that we're tiny?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 01:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 01:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-31 09:34 am (UTC)She is also a school teacher, so I suppose the combination of interests was what got LJ's attention.
Crappy. :-(
(no subject)
Date: 2007-06-01 12:08 am (UTC)It's more like 5 million USERS and of that a tiny percentage has updated in the last 30 days. Of that, an even SMALLER percentage are actually paid.
The comm is at nearly 30,000 and growing. I think it's a larger swath than people think.