(no subject)
May. 20th, 2007 12:28 pmWhat do you do when everyone is squeeing over something that offends you in ways that are distinctly not politically correct? (The political incorrectness is on my part, not the "somethings" part.)
I know. Just don't say anything.
But it's annoying that I don't feel free to express that opinion openly.
I know. Just don't say anything.
But it's annoying that I don't feel free to express that opinion openly.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 04:38 pm (UTC)Of course, you run a decent risk of people trying to talk you into liking the thing that you just finished saying you know you have non-PC reasons for disliking.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 04:49 pm (UTC)(And the idea of going to someone else's lj and harshing their bliss over something - no. That's just wrong.).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 04:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:00 pm (UTC)That's one of the problem. This is about something I regard as wrong and bad, but most people think of as, at worst, neutral. And I can't fault them for thinking that way. (And given the nature of the thing that bothers me, it's not even worth getting worked up about - there's that, too.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 04:45 pm (UTC)Please understand - I'm not putting down political correctness. I think it's actually an important thing to be considerate of the feelings of others both as groups and as individuals.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:13 pm (UTC)I guess others find it hard to respect a position that they see as discriminating against others. And a lot of people would see being against intermarriage as being discriminatory against non-Jews. Usually I don't say anything, unless I know the people I'm talking to really well and know that they know my general beliefs.
Now I'm curious as to what this "ode to intermarriage" is...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-21 02:41 pm (UTC)It's just the song itself - I know it was meant to be funny, but the guy used words like "shiksa" and the one Jewish woman who appeared slept with his brother and the whole thing hit a big button with me.
(And my reaction gets more and more silly as I write this.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-22 03:49 am (UTC)Without having heard the song, I can't say, but I'm guessing it's pro-intermarriage in a way that's actually more like being disrespectful of the singer's own ethnic/religious group?
I think "I think the fanvid is very cute, but I found the song problematic, and here's why" would be a reasonable thing to say.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:24 pm (UTC)And now I understand better. But... meh, I usually don't comment on anyone's squee if it's not my thing.
Once, once someone posted a picture of a character who had been changed in canon in a way I loathed (he became a sexed-up Nazi, actually) and said "Anyone who doesn't think is sexy is crazy." and I just had to comment that I did NOT think it was sexy at all. Then I deleted my comment in shame. And the person edited it to say "Except
And I had been doing so well keeping my complete hatred of this plot change to myself, because people were requesting I write about it, and writing it for me, because they apparently didn't know.
That's pretty different from something you don't like for a true ideological reason, but still... it annoyed me to hear all the squee. Though in the end, yeah, I should have kept my mouth shut in my case.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 06:10 pm (UTC)On the other hand - a Nazi? You were fully justified in saying something. That should be offensive to most people.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-21 02:34 am (UTC)Then one of the good guys, who was pretty much my favorite fictional character, went over to their side, (at first, we thought, unwillingly, but now apparently not entirely) and practially the whole fandom said "What an interesting development! And he looks so cool as a young vampire!" and I said "The hell."
So it's not a case of Nazi sympathies, which yeah, would of course be offensive.
Fortunately there's another version of canon which everyone hates where that didn't happen.
Gosh that got long. Sorry about that.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:29 pm (UTC)I just finished writing one that's very interfaith. I came up in a place where it wasn't a big deal. There were usually a couple squabbles about how to spend the holidays, but after that, the couples went about their lives.
Then again, the folks I know have "been Jewish" in the same way the folks I know have "been Christian." Culturally, with a few nods to the religious side of it. For them, learning Hebrew was the same as my Catholic friends taking Catechism classes: expected and promptly forgotten after the ritual at the end.
Thanks for the heads-up. It never even occured to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 06:39 pm (UTC)I think part of it is media influence. Most of the Jewish characters on television are involved with non-Jews. I'd almost support Wilson/Cuddy because it would be that rarest of beasts - two Jews together. Except they'd be very bad for each other. Sharing the religion they don't practice isn't enough. :)
It would just be *nice* to see.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 08:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 04:52 pm (UTC)It boils down to religious sensibilities. Which I really don't expect others to respect.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:04 pm (UTC)But then, it's probably good for me not to mention some things just in order to maintain boundaries, too.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:15 pm (UTC)I'm mildly offended by something that no one is forcing me to see. (Yes, I do get that). It's not a modesty thing - not in particular, since there's nothing immodest in the thing, and not in general since I can't pretend that modesty is a problem when it comes to slash fiction. Real people stuff is a different story, but this is not real. It's about fictional characters, after all.
And there are things about it that are offensive for different (and non-religious reasons) that I'm not as bothered about. And I also recognize that humor has its own rules.
Of all things to break this particular camel's back, this is about the silliest. But there it is. And everyone is so happy about it, and I'm sitting here feeling offended about "How dare they like this funny, well-made thing that is mildly offending me?" And more, "And I shouldn't say anything about it, because I don't want to offend anyone."
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-22 03:52 am (UTC)Is everyone so happy about it? For sure?
I don't know whether or not they are, I'm posing the question.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:12 pm (UTC)... That shouldn't be the case. Why is "I can't like this thing because intermarriage goes against my religious beliefs" of any less value or less worthy of respect as an opinion than, say, "I can't like this thing because it features a character I don't like" or "because it hits my embarrassment squick" or "because I refuse to read incestfic" or {pick a reason that has nothing to do with faith and just causes a visceral reaction}? Because being against intermarriage is not the multiculti, inclusive, accepted thing to be? So is believing in G-d and you aren't about to start being embarrassed about that, are you?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:20 pm (UTC)Given my own experience and mindset, intermarriage would honestly never have registered as something that would be bothersome. Having another voice say, "hey, this isn't a neutral thing" adds nuance & complexity to my own understanding. I'm afraid that sounds like "your discomfort is a learning opportunity for me", which isn't a nice role to be put into, but a well-delivered dissent from the squee can have a lot of value.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:45 pm (UTC)I left the old senslash mailing list because of such an argument, where I got more and more shrill in defending my position and ultimately decided that the best thing I could do for everyone would be to quietly unsubscribe.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:33 pm (UTC)I think one of my problems is that I tend to want to make these posts in the heat of the moment, when I *know* I'm too emotional to phrase things properly. And when I cool down enough for that, the moment is gone, and a good thing, too.
But knowing that if I wait a bit and make a reasoned response on my own LJ won't make everyone hate me - that helps. Not this time - I've sabotaged that - but next time.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:28 pm (UTC)I think this is something that's been building in me.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:26 pm (UTC)I'm not shy about other squicks of mine.
But, huh. Yeah. I think there are ways of saying it that, if I hadn't made such a, um, megillah out of it this time, I could have said. Now, not much point. "I think that this particular songvid is funny and well-done. Unfortunately, it hits my intermarriage squick hard, and I had to shut it off before it was over."
But the opportunity will come again.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:49 pm (UTC)I appreciate seeing this, because I was in fact feeling *extremely* hurt and offended.
I think it's worth bearing in mind how much "politically correct" means "actually paying attention to other people's feelings".
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 06:06 pm (UTC)As I said earlier, I do think political correctness is a good thing.
However, I'm human. I can have conflicting desires, and since it often seems that traditional religious beliefs are fair game, even though everyone has people with those beliefs on their friendslists (at least *one* :)), it feels like political correctness applies to everyone else sometimes.
And I usually just seethe to myself and say nothing, but it builds and it's often a silly thing that will be too much. And then I still can't say anything. So, it's frustrating.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:28 pm (UTC)Sorry, now I'm making this about me, and I don't mean to. I'm just tired after work.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 06:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-21 02:38 am (UTC)So it wasn't like it would have been easy for me to just find a community like that.
I'm sorry, I know you're not calling me on this. I'm just having trouble with it and expressing it here, which may not really be appropriate.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-21 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-20 05:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-21 02:25 am (UTC)I do not regret my decision to marry my husband, but I never imagined an interfaith marrige would have such a profound effect.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-21 06:19 am (UTC)Is this an issue that is up to the discretion of the local archbishop or cardinal? That's the only explanation I can think of, but I'm just a Protestant heretic.
But if you're indeed correct, you're right, that stinks on toast.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-05-21 02:12 pm (UTC)