Studio 60 (mostly a rant)
Nov. 28th, 2006 12:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have no intentions of watching next week's episode, of course, since I never watch Christmas-themed episodes in December, but I wonder if I'm going to watch any other episode. Surely my time would be better spent just watching Heroes in its entirety. After all, Heroes is actually good.
There was so much bad about this last episode. Just so much.
1. If there's a virus epidemic going on in the building, why would the network allow them to go on and infect a live audience?
2. If a hostage situation has just ended in blood and bullets, why wasn't the show pre-empted for, oh, NEWS?
3. A sketch about hostages is in very bad taste while there is an ongoing hostage situation, even if it didn't end in blood and bullets.
4. Harriet is supposedly a talented comedian. If she weren't, she wouldn't be allowed in the Falstaff Society (one assumes.) She can tell jokes with set-ups and punchlines. We know that because she does thenews, which is essentially a series of set-ups and punchlines. No matter how much Sorkin dislikes Kristin Chenoweth (who does not do that sort of humor, I assume), there's only so much he can graft onto Harriet.
4b. There is a rule about ethnic humor. This rule is that only members of an ethnic group can tell ethnic jokes. Harriet telling a Jewish joke breaks that rule. Yes, there are exceptions - mainly comedians like Mencia, because ethnic jokes are his entire shtick - plus he makes fun of his own group as much or more, he makes fun of stupid people even more than that *and* he stears clear of religion. And that is NOT Harriet's shtick. And then she tells it badly, which makes it either a joke against women or about whitebread comics, which makes it offensive on an entirely different level.
5. Jordan's pregnancy makes very little sense, but Jordan makes very little sense. And, wow. Pregnant women are hormonal so they can't make good choices when they talk to interviewers. If she can't do that, then she surely can't run a network.
6.Spitting at the only healthy member of the cast? Mean, much?
This show is getting less and less watchable. As I said, next week is already gone. TVland is getting pretty darn annoying as it is without me voluntarily watching the programming that tells me something is wrong with me because I lack "Christmas spirit". The question remains about the weeks that follow that.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:11 pm (UTC)But seriously, I've put on shows with people standing around reading from a script, too much money and time is involved to just scrap it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 06:27 pm (UTC)And that it took Danny to tell her that, in fact, some guys out there found it funny, so it's okay after all, only to have her then faint.
The whole thing just made me so annoyed. Sorkin's misogyny knows no bounds.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:12 pm (UTC)Suddenly he writes a show where the women are idiots who don't even have the vershtant to understand their own characters. All right, he doesn't like Chenoweth, and puts that into Harriet, but where does Jordan's incompetence come from? It can't just be "the beautiful woman must be incompetent", because she's THE PRESIDENT OF A NETWORK. By definition not incompetent. None of this makes any sense.
Did Sorkin have a stroke last year? Could explain his absence from the writing of West Wing, combined with the apparent personality change that makes these characters so unbelievable.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 08:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 08:43 pm (UTC)So I don't see Studio 60 as a departure for him. I think that, deep down, he's never been comfortable with competent women, and so he has to sexualize them and, when that doesn't work, he has to embarrass them in sexual ways to undercut their authority and ease his own anxiety.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 12:33 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:21 pm (UTC)I don't know why they were still going to do the hostage skit--you're totally right, it's bad taste no matter how it ends. That was lame.
Jordan being pregnant--you know, last week I kept looking at Amanda Peet and thinking that she was pregnant and I wondered how they were going to work that in. Guess we know now. Also, could they have made it any more obvious with the Matt/Danny pregnant thing? As soon as they said it the first time, I knew what Jordan's "bombshell" was going to be.
Anyway, I'll still keep watching, but, yeah, Heroes is much better.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:29 pm (UTC)There are ways of showing a woman is pregnant without her becoming irrational. Really.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:27 pm (UTC)You know, I never noticed the similarities between Harriet and Krisin Chenoweth until you said that, but it is now completely obvious. Do I want to know why Sorkin doesn't like her?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:31 pm (UTC)BTW, why would B-12 be bad for pregnant women? Would it hurt the fetus?
And, yes, there's the internet snobbery.
I kept yelling - you have Dilbert27's email. Email him.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:48 pm (UTC)Wow. That makes even less sense than Matt and Harry.
Anyway. I can't think of any reason why a pregnant woman couldn't take a B12 shot (aka Folic Acid). The injectable preparation contains a minute amount of Cyanide so really paranoid pregnant women might not want to take it. I checked some sites on the web since I mostly deal with the elderly and don't have to consider pregnancy when giving out shots. All the sites I could find either said that pregnant women could use the product as directed or to check with their doctor first.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 05:56 pm (UTC)They apparently had a bad breakup - and no kidding.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 06:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:15 pm (UTC)Not necessarily. Most blogs don't force you to leave a publicly-visible email address. Which means it's up to the blog owner, if even he leaves a publicly-visible email address, to allow you to know who it is. And even then, people can post anonymously, with only an IP address logged. With multi-user systems, firewalls, dynamic IP assignment, etc. it can be very difficult to link the IP address back to a physical user.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 06:00 pm (UTC)Not, obv., that that makes the rest of the episode better. I'm just sayin. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 06:57 pm (UTC)My curiosity is piqued. Why? Is it just because of the incessant pushing of the holiday on us this time of year? Does this mean you wouldn't watch something like Doctor Who's The Christmas Invasion, which had pretty much nothing to do with the holiday?
(By the way, Aaron Sorkin's Christmas-themed episodes tend to be pretty good. Because they're usually focused on other things, not Christmas.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:20 pm (UTC)The second one, is about Toby reconciling with his father, with all the Xmas music going constantly, and Xmas decorations heavy in the sets, and Toby's father the ex-gangster being moved by "Oh Holy Night". I have to figure Sorkin was told off for not making his Xmas episode Xmassy enough.
Surely this one will be all full of the Christmas Spirit, given the general obnoxiousness of Harriet's wearing her faith on her sleeve.
On an unrelated note, we then watched the Daily Show, where Jon interviewed Rahm Emanuel. Curious about his name, I looked up his bio on Wikipedia. Israeli parents, brothers named Ari & Ezekiel, children named Zechariah, Ilana and Leah, he & his wife active in a Modern Orthodox synagogue in Chicago. Funny how we didn't hear about his being a Jew, much less observant, unlike how Lieberman trumpeted his own observance six years ago.
I then went to Debbie and chanted "One of us! One of us!"
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:29 pm (UTC)Rep. Emanuel, like many of us, tends to consider his religious observance a private matter. As for Lieberman's trumpeting of his observance, well, when you run for Vice-President, you have a slightly higher profile than when you're simply one of many in Congress.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 08:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 08:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 08:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 07:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-28 07:26 pm (UTC)I've watched the Dr. Who episode already, after I was assured that it was necessary and not very obnoxious in those aspects (and they were right about that.) I also watched months ago, so it was separated from all the annoyingness now. I did make a point that I won't watch these episodes in *December*.