Yep, Bored
Apr. 19th, 2005 12:15 pmI'm alone at the office. No bosses, no agents. The phone is, at the moment, silent. I have no pending work - in fact, before one boss left, I asked him if he needed me to do something because I had no work, and he said, "Tomorrow."
Which means I have nothing to do.
Entertain me.
Please?
Or I'll be forced to do something drastic. Like troll through ff.net.
Which means I have nothing to do.
Entertain me.
Please?
Or I'll be forced to do something drastic. Like troll through ff.net.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 04:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 04:23 pm (UTC)who's there?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 04:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 04:38 pm (UTC)Lemmy who?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 06:06 pm (UTC)*sorry, best I could come up with on short notice*
Welcome to my world
Date: 2005-04-19 04:28 pm (UTC)I'm almost always alone at the office. I used to spend half the day at the austen.com chatroom (There's a great quote from Emma there: "She found it easier to chat than to study,") but then I discovered lj. And now, my boss is onto me, so he's keeping me pretty busy all day. Gam zu l'tova. I was feeling pretty guilty about wasting his time. But I don't feel guilty about this post. I hope it was entertaining enough.
Re: Welcome to my world
Date: 2005-04-19 04:30 pm (UTC)But, well. :)
I used to spend the entire day in chat, too. I'm now not permitted to do that.
LJ keeps me sane.
Maybe I'll write something.
Let's see. Who's owed a story?
Re: Welcome to my world
Date: 2005-04-19 04:35 pm (UTC)(i don't actually know if you owe me a story. but feel free to write me one if you like. [g])
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 04:29 pm (UTC)Two, turn on your radio. There's a new Pope. Really.
Three, http://cowswithguns.com/cowmovie.html (flash movie, fun)
Who is it?
Date: 2005-04-19 04:33 pm (UTC)I don't have a radio and it's not on yahoo news yet.
Re: Who is it?
Date: 2005-04-19 04:35 pm (UTC)Re: Who is it?
Date: 2005-04-19 04:52 pm (UTC)Not who I was expecting, but I'm bad at handicapping these things.
Benedict XVI. I wonder if it means something - and it's going to be odd getting used to a different name.
Re: Who is it?
Date: 2005-04-19 04:59 pm (UTC)That's the German one? The one who's in favor of more de-centralization of the church?
Re: Who is it?
Date: 2005-04-19 05:10 pm (UTC)Feh.
Re: Who is it?
Date: 2005-04-19 05:00 pm (UTC)Re: Who is it?
Date: 2005-04-19 06:13 pm (UTC)Makes his name choice very interesting indeed.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 04:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 05:09 pm (UTC)Currently swearing nasty vehement language while praying for this papal reign to be identical to that of Pope John Paul I (or shorter). NOT able to concentrate.
Damn. Just when you think the world can't get scarier, it does.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 05:34 pm (UTC)She's NOT happy. She wanted someone younger and non-European, and she doesn't think a conservative pope will have the answers she wants.
Benedict XV tried to create peace during WWI and was known for humanitarian efforts - and for being on the progressive side. So he chose an interesting name.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 05:42 pm (UTC)Silly old Vatican II, anyway. Buncha hippie sissies! (Or maybe sissy hippies!)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 05:53 pm (UTC)But seeing the reactions of my friend here and of people online doesn't make me happy. For them.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-20 02:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-20 03:14 pm (UTC)Then I wasn't anymore. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 05:47 pm (UTC)Ratzinger -- Palpatine I, as I have been hearing around the net -- bothers me.
There are some apologist sites that claim he was Hitler Youth only reluctantly and by lack of choice. Except that some of his peers refused. And so should a man who would be Pope have that strength of character. And not be so narrow of mind as he's reputed to be.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 05:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 06:06 pm (UTC)Why don't you believe the "apologists?" I read that his father was an anti-Nazi activist and that Ratzinger himself deserted the army in May 1945 at the risk of his life. It sounds admirable to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-04-19 09:35 pm (UTC)In addition, while he is unquestionably intelligent, and seems to have integrity, he apparently has done an otherwise David Horowitz-like 180-degree turn from openminded to a narrow focus. Perhaps that's what being Defender of the Faith (or whatever the formal name of his recent office was; I understand it's essentially a direct-line descendent of Chief Inquisitor) does to one (or perhaps it's a requirement of the office). It's not comforting, either way.
Chief Inquisitor?
Date: 2005-04-20 03:38 pm (UTC)Now that's scary. One wonders why the Catholic Church has seen fit to maintain such an office over the centuries.
Re: Chief Inquisitor?
Date: 2005-04-20 03:51 pm (UTC)The reasons for each's existence boil down to the same thing, though: to determine which beliefs and behaviors constitute heresy (that is, fall outside compatibility with Church dogma) and to remove those beliefs (and their holders, if necessary) from the Church.
Then-Cardinal Ratzinger did such a good job at this that he has earned the nickname God's Rottweiler. Straight-and-narrowminded folks worry me, and he has shown himself to be one of the most of those.
Benedict v. Joseph
Date: 2005-04-19 06:16 pm (UTC)Never knew anything about Benedict XV, but what's wrong with his given name Joseph, right from the Bible?
Re: Benedict v. Joseph
Date: 2005-04-19 06:21 pm (UTC)Re: Benedict v. Joseph
Date: 2005-04-19 06:32 pm (UTC)Really? I don't ever remember his being called that.
But anyway, I think it's a shame they didn't pick a Latin American. I heard someone on the radio making a good case for it. Latin America has the poorest yet largest and most devoted Catholic population worldwide. They need the chizuk as it were.
Re: Benedict v. Joseph
Date: 2005-04-19 06:43 pm (UTC)I agree with you about Hernandez. It's time for them to move out of Europe and represent those who are truly believers.