Happiness is an empty in box
Mar. 24th, 2004 04:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The secret for me to keep on track and *finish* my work seems to be, "You can't play on LJ until you finish so many listings."
In other randomness:
One thing I haven't seen in all the various Lunacon reports is mention of one minor but amusing thing:
The convention posted notices all over the hotel saying "New York State Law prohibits smoking in all public area's". Yes. "Area's".
I reacted to my first sight of those notices in pain and horror. I apparently wasn't alone, because by Friday evening, all the apostrophes had been crossed out. Some signs were also amended with words like "boundaries" or "vicinities".
By Saturday afternoon, someone added his/her *own* signs below the notices stating that "Extra apostrophes (ie, "area's") is prohibited by the English language."
Others then corrected some of *those* to "eg", although that's actually a judgement call.
SF fans - editors all. :)
eta that the added signs said "are prohibited". Sorry.
In other randomness:
One thing I haven't seen in all the various Lunacon reports is mention of one minor but amusing thing:
The convention posted notices all over the hotel saying "New York State Law prohibits smoking in all public area's". Yes. "Area's".
I reacted to my first sight of those notices in pain and horror. I apparently wasn't alone, because by Friday evening, all the apostrophes had been crossed out. Some signs were also amended with words like "boundaries" or "vicinities".
By Saturday afternoon, someone added his/her *own* signs below the notices stating that "Extra apostrophes (ie, "area's") is prohibited by the English language."
Others then corrected some of *those* to "eg", although that's actually a judgement call.
SF fans - editors all. :)
eta that the added signs said "are prohibited". Sorry.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 01:20 pm (UTC)And NO ONE corrected the singular to a plural?
Extra apostrophes ARE prohibited! ARE!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 01:26 pm (UTC)And thanks.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 01:31 pm (UTC)It also fits the 'net-rule that any correction to spelling/grammar in a post will itself include a grammar/spelling error. :)
(Triple-checks these things in own post.)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 02:08 pm (UTC)They come from the Latin phrases which mean something or other (I can't remember, but I can look it up), and are therefore rather specific.
Most people, however, have it backward and use "i.e." most of the time, where "e.g." is usually what people should be using.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 02:23 pm (UTC)"e.g." = "exempli gratis" (IIRC), literally, "free example"
You've fairly well noted what they're for (though I'd have said "i.e." is for summaries or explication, rather than having covered all examples in a class).
Most people have their head in dark dank places where grammar is concerned. We love them anyway, and secretly correct their errors so that if someone who knows what they're talking about sees their writing, said reader has a chance to get the content without being blinded by the failures of form :-)
We are the Gnomes of Correction, and we rule by means of whiteout and the Delete key :-D
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 02:34 pm (UTC)And yes, I would agree that your definition of "i.e." is better than mine. And I further agree that people have their heads in dark dank places where grammar is concerned. My father was the grammar nazi (if you'll pardon the expression), and it rubbed off on me.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 03:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 04:06 pm (UTC)http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif
There's also one about "Its" vs "It's", but I can't find it right now. I'll have to ask my hubby when he gets home.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-24 04:13 pm (UTC)