mamadeb: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
[personal profile] mamadeb
[livejournal.com profile] spykeraven had an interesting point:

We need something to identify heterosexual supporters of lgbt rights.

So. Anyone want to make an icon for us - something worksafe (please!) that says "Straight, but not Narrow"?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 08:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mommybird.livejournal.com
*applauds your icon*

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 08:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rachel-wilder.livejournal.com
I totally agree...I made a very simple icon and linked it in [livejournal.com profile] spykeraven's journal. Please use it if you like.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 09:02 am (UTC)
ext_2233: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
From: [identity profile] mamadeb.livejournal.com
Thank you!

Yeah, I think that does the job.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 09:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darthfox.livejournal.com
not that i'm looking to cause trouble -- but why?

seriously. isn't a straight person's sexuality as much her (or his) business as lgbts' sexuality is theirs? how is my choice of sexual partners in the least bit relevant to the fact that i think lgbts should have the same rights as straight people?

i dig, at some level, the idea that it's important to note that equal rights are not just something a minority group is whingeing about -- that a chunk of the mainstream feels a (legitimate) need to alert the rest of the mainstream to the fact that it's wrong, wrong, wrong to persist in making it an us-vs.-them struggle. (there are chunks of the minority group that need to be alerted to that fact as well, actually.) but at the same time, i feel like emphasizing the sexuality of people working for equal rights irrespective of sexuality is precisely the wrong message to be sending. it preserves the us-and-them division: "i'm not ________, but ..."

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 02:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spykeraven.livejournal.com
but at the same time, i feel like emphasizing the sexuality of people working for equal rights irrespective of sexuality is precisely the wrong message to be sending. it preserves the us-and-them division

I agree with you. It's complicated.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 11:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catmoran.livejournal.com
I've been wanting a bumpersticker that says "friend of the family" with family in rainbow colors...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ailsaek.livejournal.com
Adam once suggested getting one of those "I"m not gay, but my girlfriend is" T-shirts, but I realize that's not universally helpful.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-12 11:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quecojones.livejournal.com
Pardon my dumbassness (is that even a word?), but what does "lgbt" mean exactly?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-13 04:50 am (UTC)
ext_2233: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
From: [identity profile] mamadeb.livejournal.com
"Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender" (and being too lazy to capitalize, in my case.)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-11-13 07:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quecojones.livejournal.com
Something tells me I should have known this... ;)

Profile

mamadeb: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
mamadeb

February 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
2728     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags