Dress code

Jul. 14th, 2003 02:12 pm
mamadeb: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
[personal profile] mamadeb
My employers just instituted a dress code for the office. It is nothing unreasonable, imho - no shorts, no bare midriffs, tanktops or camisoles, no halter dresses or tops, no miniskirts or low necklines, no t-shirts (at least, no t-shirts with words or decorations.)

They would prefer casual business attire - shirts, ties and nice pants for the men; blouses and dress pants or skirts for the women (and they'd love suits or dresses), but will take jeans so long as they're not worn with a ratty t-shirt or a camisole or such. My employers themselves always dress better than these requirements.

This is a business and it's not unreasonable to expect people to dress in a businesslike manner, imho, as opposed to being dressed for the beach.

But then again, I was hired, in some small part, because, as they said, "You're not going to wear a halter and shorts." BTW, be grateful for that. :) So, I'm already surpassing code.

We are all, however, amused at the clause that requires bathing, largely because no one currently here seems to be remiss in that.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-07-14 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darthhellokitty.livejournal.com
We are all, however, amused at the clause that requires bathing, largely because no one currently here seems to be remiss in that.

Yeah, but you never know when they're going to hire somebody else who was perfectly fresh at the interview, but...

Profile

mamadeb: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
mamadeb

February 2011

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
2728     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags