I finally saw the whole thing consecutively yesterday.
Things I liked:
Much, much pretty.
Jack's canonical orientation.
The butterfly motif.
The piano.
The lack of any overt Christian imagery or references.
The pretty.
The queen.
The KJV style of the press releases.
How David conquered the Goliath.
Things I don't mind:
Jesse being female.
The reordering of the story for dramatic reasons.
The changing of the story for dramatic reasons.
Things that bug slightly:
Why Silas and not Saul?
The Hero being the only blond. (It's a trope I really hate - good guys always seem to be blonds in an otherwise dark cast.)
The dejudaizing of the whole thing. I get it; I don't have to like it.
Thing that made me go "HUH?"
Liszt - it's an alternate universe. It has countries named Gilboa and Gath and Oesterria (or however it's spelled.) That they speak English is something I'm glossing over - I'm figuring magical TV translating. But that our universe and their universe share a composer just doesn't work for me.
Things I liked:
Much, much pretty.
Jack's canonical orientation.
The butterfly motif.
The piano.
The lack of any overt Christian imagery or references.
The pretty.
The queen.
The KJV style of the press releases.
How David conquered the Goliath.
Things I don't mind:
Jesse being female.
The reordering of the story for dramatic reasons.
The changing of the story for dramatic reasons.
Things that bug slightly:
Why Silas and not Saul?
The Hero being the only blond. (It's a trope I really hate - good guys always seem to be blonds in an otherwise dark cast.)
The dejudaizing of the whole thing. I get it; I don't have to like it.
Thing that made me go "HUH?"
Liszt - it's an alternate universe. It has countries named Gilboa and Gath and Oesterria (or however it's spelled.) That they speak English is something I'm glossing over - I'm figuring magical TV translating. But that our universe and their universe share a composer just doesn't work for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 05:12 pm (UTC)There's a lot I like, but you summarized it pretty well. :-)
The whiteness of the main cast annoys me, but this is American TV. Unfortunately. As for the blondness of David and the gayness of Jonathan, those bother me a lot if they do intend to go the "David = good, Jonathan = evil" route. However, I'm hoping that the show is setting up these cliches in order to subvert them. They certainly claim in interviews that Jonathan isn't a villain and David isn't a pure hero.
(My secret hope is that the show was foreshadowing when David was told "I'd think you were a spy, if you weren't my brother." After all, the Biblical David allies himself with Gath/the Philistines [1 Samuel 27], and the easiest way to get yourself in the king's confidence is to rescue his son using your double-crossing knowledge . . .)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 05:12 pm (UTC)Silas is, at least to me, more of an N.T. name (one of Paul's associates on his missionary journeys. Paul's original first name was Saul, by the way). I don't know if that fits into the scriptwriters' logic at all, though.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 06:12 pm (UTC)This is a minor button with me, because I find "Jack" a silly nickname for "Jonathan". I know - people go "Jonathan - Jon - John - Jack", but that makes no sense from my point of view. The silent "h" in John is because it originated from the name "Yochanon" - it's from the letter "chet". In which case, "Jack" makes sense.
On the other hand, Jonathan = Yonatan. No extra chet there. It drives my husband slightly nuts when people spell his name "Johnathan" because that's so very wrong.
I think it is distancing itself to some degree (although - David Shepherd? Rev. Samuels? That the Royal family is named Benjamin? Not going *that* far. But they probably don't want to seem "too Jewish" or something.
ETA: A brief search yields this : Silas is Greek for the Aramaic Seila, which, in turn, is from the Hebrew Saul. Now it make sense.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 06:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 06:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 06:16 pm (UTC)Foreign Policies That Make You Go "Hm..."
Date: 2009-03-19 06:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 06:57 pm (UTC)Things I like: the setting. The reimagining of one of my favorite mythic stories.
I am on the fence on this one right now.
Re: Foreign Policies That Make You Go "Hm..."
Date: 2009-03-19 07:00 pm (UTC)At the very least, we outnumber them.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 07:03 pm (UTC)We'll see if Jack is truly evil. But Samuels is very Magical.
Re: Foreign Policies That Make You Go "Hm..."
Date: 2009-03-19 07:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-19 07:14 pm (UTC)Re: Foreign Policies That Make You Go "Hm..."
Date: 2009-03-20 12:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-20 01:01 pm (UTC)The Big City is not really New York, though. The buildings are all different, much more modern, since the City seems to be a huge project of Urban Renewal or even totally new construction like Brasilia.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-03-26 05:59 pm (UTC)Liszt - it's an alternate universe
Also, 1874 years since what exactly?
This is more the Chronicles David than the Samuel David, at least as far as the 2 hour movie goes. I dislike the way they disambiguated King Saul. The reason Saul loses the kingship is terribly vexing, and in Kings Silas loses the kingship for completely understandable reasons.
Re: Foreign Policies That Make You Go "Hm..."
Date: 2009-03-26 06:00 pm (UTC)Re: Foreign Policies That Make You Go "Hm..."
Date: 2009-03-27 03:12 am (UTC)