July 4th thought
Jul. 4th, 2007 12:41 pmLast night, Keith Olbermann had another Special Comment, in which he went on national television and demanded the resignation of both Bush and Cheney.
And THIS is the strength of our nation and our constitution - he did so without fear of retribution - he is free, alive and employed this morning.
It doesn't matter if you cheered at what he said or wanted to throw stuff at the screen. Certainly, people have said things as bad about Clinton and other former presidents while they were in office. And they were also left free, alive and employed. As they should have been. Roosevelt was roundly criticized all through his administration. As he should have been.
We take these basic freedoms for granted in this country. And that is one of our strengths.
And whether you support Bush or hate him, that strength remains.
And THIS is the strength of our nation and our constitution - he did so without fear of retribution - he is free, alive and employed this morning.
It doesn't matter if you cheered at what he said or wanted to throw stuff at the screen. Certainly, people have said things as bad about Clinton and other former presidents while they were in office. And they were also left free, alive and employed. As they should have been. Roosevelt was roundly criticized all through his administration. As he should have been.
We take these basic freedoms for granted in this country. And that is one of our strengths.
And whether you support Bush or hate him, that strength remains.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 04:59 pm (UTC)Freedom of speech is a wonderful thing and a basic right, and Americans enjoy it to a far greater degree than some other peoples. But in a country ruled by the wilfully deaf, it's a right they can well afford to allow.
(I saw a quote from Lincoln in another post today that made me wonder why, given the way the country was founded, the founding fathers never thought to write into the Constitution the right to have a revolution if things got too bad. Probably a good thing they didn't, on the whole...but it would come in mighty handy around now.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 04:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 05:03 pm (UTC)So a revolution is less imperative.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 05:21 pm (UTC)After her, is President of the Senate pro tempore -- Robert Byrd -- and after him is the Secretary of State, Condeleeza Rice, and then the rest of the Secretaries in order of establishment of their Departments (barring those office holders who are ineligible for presidential office by not being natural-born citizens). The Presidential Order of Succession for the United States is really well established -- in case of a freak accident or deliberate targeting of the executive branch, the country is prepared.
the founding fathers never thought to write into the Constitution the right to have a revolution if things got too bad
Err, why do think the Right to Bear Arms was included in the Bill of Rights? Or the bit about 'enemies, foreign or *domestic*' in the oath of office? The Founders certainly knew about the possibility having to revolt.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 08:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-04 08:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 01:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 01:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 01:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 01:54 am (UTC)(I have to admit to curiosity. How did you happen to find this?)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 04:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 04:54 am (UTC)Because we do have free speech and free press. Yes, it's entirely possible
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-05 02:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-06 08:28 pm (UTC)